* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But regardless, that least version looks perfectly fine to me even
> without that random tweak.
Thanks, I turned this into:
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds
Ingo
* Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/10/2018 02:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > At the risk of bike-shedding, we could remove all the
> >
> > default1 if !SMP
> >
> > from the BEGIN/END/DEFAULT things, and perhaps just keep that part in
> > NR_CPUS.
> >
> > I
On 02/10/2018 02:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> At the risk of bike-shedding, we could remove all the
>
> default1 if !SMP
>
> from the BEGIN/END/DEFAULT things, and perhaps just keep that part in NR_CPUS.
>
> I didn't check, but I *think* it would work to just
Looks good to me.
At the risk of bike-shedding, we could remove all the
default1 if !SMP
from the BEGIN/END/DEFAULT things, and perhaps just keep that part in NR_CPUS.
I didn't check, but I *think* it would work to just do
config NR_CPUS
int "Maximum number of CPUs" if SMP
On 02/10/2018 03:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds
>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 66
>> +--
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> Here is a full combo patch of your patch and
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> =>
> Subject: x86/Kconfig: Further simplify the NR_CPUS config
> From: Ingo Molnar
> Date: Sat Feb 10 11:51:57 CET 2018
>
> Clean up various aspects of the x86 CONFIG_NR_CPUS configuration switches:
>
> - Rename the three CONFIG_NR_CPUS related v
6 matches
Mail list logo
