(2013/12/04 0:12), Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:16:35PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
Even if copying partial pages into the 2nd kernel, we need to use ioremap()
once on them, and I think the ioremap() is exactly similar to
remap_pfn_range() for a single page. There seems
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:16:35PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
> >Even if copying partial pages into the 2nd kernel, we need to use ioremap()
> >once on them, and I think the ioremap() is exactly similar to
> >remap_pfn_range() for a single page. There seems no difference on safeness
> >be
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:18:16AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> (2013/12/03 0:27), Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:48:02PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> >>Hello Vivek,
> >>
> >>Here is a patch set for mmap failure for /proc/vmcore.
> >>Could you try to use this on the proble
(2013/12/03 10:18), HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
(2013/12/03 0:27), Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:48:02PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
Hello Vivek,
Here is a patch set for mmap failure for /proc/vmcore.
Could you try to use this on the problematic system?
This patch doesn't copy
(2013/12/03 0:27), Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:48:02PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
Hello Vivek,
Here is a patch set for mmap failure for /proc/vmcore.
Could you try to use this on the problematic system?
This patch doesn't copy partial pages to the 2nd kernel, only prepare
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:48:02PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> Hello Vivek,
>
> Here is a patch set for mmap failure for /proc/vmcore.
> Could you try to use this on the problematic system?
>
> This patch doesn't copy partial pages to the 2nd kernel, only prepares
> vmcore objects for respec
6 matches
Mail list logo
