On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Jim Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
> On Fr
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>>>
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>>>
>> +depmod=`whereis depmod | awk '{print $2}'`
>
>>
>>> I suspect
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>>
> +depmod=`whereis depmod | awk '{print $2}'`
>
>> I suspect it'll be hard to come up with something that's 100%
>> foolproof and
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>
+depmod=`whereis depmod | awk '{print $2}'`
>>>
> I suspect it'll be hard to come up with something that's 100%
> foolproof and respects user's choices. Sticking with searching the
> use
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
>> wrote:
>>> The current implementation relies on 'depmod' to be available in the
>>> PATH. It also expects the version number to be
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
>> The current implementation relies on 'depmod' to be available in the
>> PATH. It also expects the version number to be found in the last field
>> as seen by 'awk'. Should the output f
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> The current implementation relies on 'depmod' to be available in the
> PATH. It also expects the version number to be found in the last field
> as seen by 'awk'. Should the output format be different, this approach
> would no longer be re
8 matches
Mail list logo