Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-10 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:28:31PM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:19 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:08:48AM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: >On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:41 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:56:16AM GMT, Jason Wang wrot

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-10 Thread Jason Wang
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:19 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:08:48AM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:41 PM Stefano Garzarella > >wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:56:16AM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: > >> >On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:15 PM Stefano

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-10 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:08:48AM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:41 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:56:16AM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: >On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:15 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> >> Hi Cindy, Jason, >> >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:59:34P

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-09 Thread Jason Wang
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:41 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:56:16AM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:15 PM Stefano Garzarella > >wrote: > >> > >> Hi Cindy, Jason, > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:59:34PM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: > >> >On Mon, Jul 8

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-09 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:56:16AM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:15 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: Hi Cindy, Jason, On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:59:34PM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: >On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:06 PM Cindy Lu wrote: >> >> On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 20:42, Stefano Garzarella

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-08 Thread Jason Wang
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:15 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Cindy, Jason, > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:59:34PM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:06 PM Cindy Lu wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 20:42, Stefano Garzarella > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-08 Thread Stefano Garzarella
Hi Cindy, Jason, On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:59:34PM GMT, Jason Wang wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:06 PM Cindy Lu wrote: On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 20:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:30:51AM GMT, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 01:28:21PM +0200,

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-08 Thread Jason Wang
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:06 PM Cindy Lu wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 20:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:30:51AM GMT, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > >On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 01:28:21PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > >> The vDPA block simulator always alloc

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-08 Thread Cindy Lu
On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 20:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:30:51AM GMT, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 01:28:21PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > >> The vDPA block simulator always allocated a 128 MiB ram-disk, but some > >> filesystems (e.g. XFS

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-05 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:30:51AM GMT, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 01:28:21PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: The vDPA block simulator always allocated a 128 MiB ram-disk, but some filesystems (e.g. XFS) may require larger minimum sizes (see https://issues.redhat.com/brow

Re: [PATCH] vdpa_sim_blk: add `capacity` module parameter

2024-07-05 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 01:28:21PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > The vDPA block simulator always allocated a 128 MiB ram-disk, but some > filesystems (e.g. XFS) may require larger minimum sizes (see > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-45951). > > So to allow us to test these filesystems,