Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Dave Mielke, on lun. 13 mars 2017 22:20:01 -0400, wrote: > It's possible that this device is using high speed because it offers a > feature > to transfer its internal clipboard to the host, and it allows that clipboard > to > contain lots of data. Interestingly, though, hidden within a usage no

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-13 Thread Dave Mielke
Thank you for your very helpful answer. I really do appreciate it. It's possible that this device is using high speed because it offers a feature to transfer its internal clipboard to the host, and it allows that clipboard to contain lots of data. Interestingly, though, hidden within a usage not

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-13 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Alan Stern, on dim. 12 mars 2017 21:40:33 -0400, wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Dave Mielke wrote: > > > [quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 21:31 -0400] > > > > > > >A device's speed is only partially related to its USB version. A > > > >U

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-13 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 21:40 -0400] > > >No, I was wondering why an HID device would run at high speed. Both > >you and Samuel implied that this was because it was a USB-2 device. > >But that is not an adequate answer, because it

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-13 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 21:40 -0400] >No, I was wondering why an HID device would run at high speed. Both >you and Samuel implied that this was because it was a USB-2 device. >But that is not an adequate answer, because it is perfectly valid for a >USB-2 device to run at f

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Alan Stern, on dim. 12 mars 2017 21:40:33 -0400, wrote: > On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Dave Mielke wrote: > > [quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 21:31 -0400] > > > > >A device's speed is only partially related to its USB version. A > > >USB-1.1 device can run at low speed or full speed. A USB-

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-12 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 21:31 -0400] >A device's speed is only partially related to its USB version. A >USB-1.1 device can run at low speed or full speed. A USB-2 device can >run at low, full, or high speed. And a USB-3 device can run at low, >full, high, or Super speed. Y

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-12 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 21:40 -0400] >No, I was wondering why an HID device would run at high speed. Both >you and Samuel implied that this was because it was a USB-2 device. >But that is not an adequate answer, because it is perfectly valid for a >USB-2 device to run at f

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-12 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 21:31 -0400] > > >A device's speed is only partially related to its USB version. A > >USB-1.1 device can run at low speed or full speed. A USB-2 device can > >run at low, full, or high speed. And a USB-3 dev

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-12 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 17:18 -0400] > > >Interesting. This is a high-speed device that mistakenly uses the > >low/full-speed encoding for an interrupt bInterval value? > > Yes. > > >That's pretty unusual. Most HID devices (which

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-12 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2017/03/12 at 17:18 -0400] >Interesting. This is a high-speed device that mistakenly uses the >low/full-speed encoding for an interrupt bInterval value? Yes. >That's pretty unusual. Most HID devices (which includes the Braille >devices I have heard of) run at lo

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Alan Stern, on dim. 12 mars 2017 17:18:51 -0400, wrote: > Interesting. This is a high-speed device that mistakenly uses the > low/full-speed encoding for an interrupt bInterval value? Yes... > That's pretty unusual. Most HID devices (which includes the Braille > devices I have heard of) run at

Re: [PATCH] usb-core: Add MS_INTR_BINTERVAL USB quirk

2017-03-12 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Some USB 2.0 devices erroneously report millisecond values in > bInterval. The generic config code manages to catch most of them, > but in some cases it's not completely enough. > > The case at stake here is a USB 2.0 braille device, which wants to >