Re: [PATCH] tracing: Allow creating instances with specified system events

2023-12-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:13:09 +0100 Dmytro Maluka wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > > > A trace instance may only need to enable specific events. As the eventfs > > directory of an instance currently creates all events

Re: [PATCH] tracing: Allow creating instances with specified system events

2023-12-05 Thread Dmytro Maluka
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > A trace instance may only need to enable specific events. As the eventfs > directory of an instance currently creates all events which adds overhead, > allow internal instances to be created with

Re: [PATCH] tracing: Allow creating instances with specified system events

2023-11-30 Thread Google
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:25:45 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 23:58:21 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > > > - Dynamic events had to be specified directly to still allow them to be > > > created. > > > > I have a question about this point. Does this mean the dyn

Re: [PATCH] tracing: Allow creating instances with specified system events

2023-11-29 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 23:58:21 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > - Dynamic events had to be specified directly to still allow them to be > > created. > > I have a question about this point. Does this mean the dynamic event files > will be created in the instance which limits the "syst

Re: [PATCH] tracing: Allow creating instances with specified system events

2023-11-29 Thread Google
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:21:17 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > A trace instance may only need to enable specific events. As the eventfs > directory of an instance currently creates all events which adds overhead, > allow internal instances to be created with just