Re: [PATCH] tracing/synthetic: Print out u64 values properly

On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 23:16:13 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > Anyways, that requires a new patch to be created on top as this has hit > > the mainline as a fix already. > > Oops, I missed that. Yeah, I took that because it matched the original case, which was it being u64. -- Stev

Re: [PATCH] tracing/synthetic: Print out u64 values properly

Hi Tero, On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:46:45 +0300 Tero Kristo wrote: > Hi Masami, > > On 15/09/2023 09:01, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > Hi Tero, > > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:17:04 +0300 > > Tero Kristo wrote: > > > >> The synth traces incorrectly print pointer to the synthetic event values

Re: [PATCH] tracing/synthetic: Print out u64 values properly

Hi Masami, On 15/09/2023 09:01, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: Hi Tero, On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:17:04 +0300 Tero Kristo wrote: The synth traces incorrectly print pointer to the synthetic event values instead of the actual value when using u64 type. Fix by addressing the contents of the unio

Re: [PATCH] tracing/synthetic: Print out u64 values properly

Hi Tero, On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:17:04 +0300 Tero Kristo wrote: > The synth traces incorrectly print pointer to the synthetic event values > instead of the actual value when using u64 type. Fix by addressing the > contents of the union properly. Thanks for pointing it out. But I would like to se