Re: [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized

2007-07-11 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:45:04PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Russell King wrote: > >Indeed, and since distros still haven't picked up my setserial v3, > >I see little chance of that ever being practical. Not that I've > >really tried very hard to get them to - no real idea who to contact > >to ma

Re: [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized

2007-07-11 Thread Yinghai Lu
Russell King wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:05:53AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Wednesday 11 July 2007 01:17:42 am Russell King wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:03:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized if the port is not initialized with

Re: [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized

2007-07-11 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:05:53AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wednesday 11 July 2007 01:17:42 am Russell King wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:03:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized > > > > > > if the port is not initialized with c

Re: [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized

2007-07-11 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 01:17:42 am Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:03:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized > > > > if the port is not initialized with correct iobase, and membase, we don't > > need to add that port. > > for x

Re: [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized

2007-07-11 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:03:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized > > if the port is not initialized with correct iobase, and membase, we don't > need to add that port. > for x86, when pnpacpi is enabled, we will not get extra ttyS1/ttyS2/ttyS3 i