Hi Willy!
On 2025-03-01 12:07:35+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> [..]
> OK so I've tested the patch below which does what we want, except that
> it reveals that the order is still not granted. Actually I haven't found
> what dictates it. On one machine (gcc-9.5, ld-2.26) I'm getting:
>
> $ ./noli
Hi Thomas!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:37:24AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > The tests are written specifically to test for execution order.
> > > While we can not rely on the order for other libcs, the idea was to
> > > expect a given order for the nolibc implementation.
> >
> > OK.
> >
>
Hi Willy,
On 2025-02-22 10:38:51+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:24:11PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2025-02-16 10:39:40+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:01:01PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > The nolibc testsuite can be run agai
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:24:11PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-02-16 10:39:40+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:01:01PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > The nolibc testsuite can be run against other libcs to test for
> > > interoperability. Some
On 2025-02-16 10:39:40+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:01:01PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > The nolibc testsuite can be run against other libcs to test for
> > interoperability. Some aspects of the constructor execution are not
> > standardized and musl does not provid
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:01:01PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The nolibc testsuite can be run against other libcs to test for
> interoperability. Some aspects of the constructor execution are not
> standardized and musl does not provide all tested feature, for one it
> does not provide argume
6 matches
Mail list logo
