Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-09-15 Thread Laurence Oberman
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:06:19 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL > > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Opdenacker > >>>>> writes: > > Michael> + * 'cam-r12b.pdf' document on http://ww

Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-09-15 Thread Laurence Oberman
- Original Message - > From: "Michael Opdenacker" > To: cor...@lwn.net, j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "martin petersen" > > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > linux-s...@vger.kernel.org, "Michael Opdenacker" > > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 9:03:05 AM > S

Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-09-15 Thread Martin K. Petersen
> "Michael" == Michael Opdenacker > writes: Michael> + * 'cam-r12b.pdf' document on http://www.t10.org/t10docs.htm Michael> + * (registration required) That link really should be http://www.t10.org/drafts.htm. You can't look up draft specifications using the proposal document search for

Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Opdenacker
Hi Martin, On 14/09/2016 19:00, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Michael> So, should we only that the cam-r12b document can be found from Michael> http://www.t10.org/t10docs.htm (registration required)?, and Michael> tell that a copy can be found on Michael> http://www.csit-sun.pub.ro/~cpop/Documenta

Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-09-14 Thread Martin K. Petersen
> "Michael" == Michael Opdenacker > writes: Michael> So, should we only that the cam-r12b document can be found from Michael> http://www.t10.org/t10docs.htm (registration required)?, and Michael> tell that a copy can be found on Michael> http://www.csit-sun.pub.ro/~cpop/Documentatie_SMP

Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-09-09 Thread Tyrel Datwyler
On 09/09/2016 01:16 AM, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > Hi James, > > Thank you very much for your help... > > On 02/07/2016 16:49, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 08:56 +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote: >>> The t10.org website containing SCSI-2 draft specifications now >>> requires to

Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-09-09 Thread Michael Opdenacker
Hi James, Thank you very much for your help... On 02/07/2016 16:49, James Bottomley wrote: On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 08:56 +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote: The t10.org website containing SCSI-2 draft specifications now requires to be from a member company to access the documents. This replaces th

Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

2016-07-02 Thread James Bottomley
On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 08:56 +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > The t10.org website containing SCSI-2 draft specifications now > requires to be from a member company to access the documents. > > This replaces the now broken link with another public resource > where the specifications can be found.