Paul Menage wrote:
> Hi Vatsa,
>
> Thanks, this looks pretty good.
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 4:42 AM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - Removed load average information. I felt it needs more thought (esp
>> to deal with SMP and virtualized platforms) and can be added
Hi Vatsa,
Thanks, this looks pretty good.
On Nov 30, 2007 4:42 AM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Removed load average information. I felt it needs more thought (esp
> to deal with SMP and virtualized platforms) and can be added for
> 2.6.25 after
* Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > thx. Have you done targeted testing of it as well? The (v2) patch is
> > in sched-devel.git:
> >
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git
> > Ingo
>
> Tested the patches on top of 2.6.24-rc3. The
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> thx. Have you done targeted testing of it as well? The (v2) patch is in
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> thx. Have you done targeted testing of it as well? The (v2) patch is in
* Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thx. Have you done targeted testing of it as well? The (v2) patch is in
sched-devel.git:
git://g
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:35:13PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Here's V2 of the cpu acccounting controller patch, which makes
> > > accounting scale better on SMP systems by splitting t
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:35:13PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here's V2 of the cpu acccounting controller patch, which makes
> > accounting scale better on SMP systems by splitting the usage counter
> > to be per-cpu.
>
> thanks, applied. B
Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
[snip]
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's V2 of the cpu acccounting controller patch, which makes
> accounting scale better on SMP systems by splitting the usage counter
> to be per-cpu.
thanks, applied. But you dont seem to have incorporated all of the
review feedback from And
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:30:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - Make the accounting scalable on SMP systems (perhaps
> > for 2.6.25)
>
> That sounds like a rather important todo. How bad is it now?
It is indeed an important todo. Right now we take a per-group global
lock on every
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:47:37 +0530
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:57:03PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> > > Regarding your concern about tracking cpu usage in different ways, it
> > > could be mitigated if we have cpuacct controller track usage as per
> >
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:20:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, this looks certainly doable for v2.6.24. I've added it to the
> scheduler fixes queue and will let it brew there for a few days and send
> it to Linus after that if everything goes fine - unless anyone objects.
Thanks.
--
Rega
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul,
> Sorry about the delay in getting back to this thread. I realized
> very recently that cpuacct controller has been removed from Linus's tree
> and have attempted to rework it as per our discussions.
>
> Linus/Ingo,
> Commit cfb
14 matches
Mail list logo
