Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Mer, 2005-03-09 at 22:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Which is? That's you're so special you don't need to care about the > workflow the ordinary humans have created? I don't see the connection between your comment and the thread sorry. If I send it all to Andrew what will happen. Andrew can e

Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:45:43PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2005-03-08 at 22:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Really - so does it go to the PCI maintainer, the IDE maintainer or the > > > DRI maintainer or someone else, or all of them, or in bits to different > > > ones remembering there

Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Maw, 2005-03-08 at 22:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Really - so does it go to the PCI maintainer, the IDE maintainer or the > > DRI maintainer or someone else, or all of them, or in bits to different > > ones remembering there are dependancies and I don't use bitcreeper ? > > If you don't kn

Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > Was there a reason you did this without using tabs, like the rest of the > > file? > > No but I'll send Linus an update to fix that now. > > > Again, the maintainer chain is well documented... > > Really - so does it go to the PCI mai

Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-08 Thread Alan Cox
On Maw, 2005-03-08 at 10:42, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Really - so does it go to the PCI maintainer, the IDE maintainer or the > > DRI maintainer or someone else, or all of them, or in bits to different > > ones remembering there are dependancies and I don't use bitcreeper ? > > it shou

Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-08 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:15:30 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Was there a reason you did this without using tabs, like the rest of the > > file? > > No but I'll send Linus an update to fix that now. > > > Again, the maintainer chain is well documented... > > Really - so does it go

Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-08 Thread Alan Cox
> Was there a reason you did this without using tabs, like the rest of the > file? No but I'll send Linus an update to fix that now. > Again, the maintainer chain is well documented... Really - so does it go to the PCI maintainer, the IDE maintainer or the DRI maintainer or someone else, or all

Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

2005-03-07 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:50:19PM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ChangeSet 1.1982.132.7, 2005/03/07 13:50:19-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel > > > > pci_ids.h | 11 +++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > diff -Nru