I agree with you.
If you will have a test result, Let me know it.
On Jan 28, 2008 6:01 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:43:56 +0900 "minchan kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I think this is actually a bugfix. The code you're removing doesn't do
> > > t
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:43:56 +0900 "minchan kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think this is actually a bugfix. The code you're removing doesn't do the
> >
> > if (priority < zone->prev_priority)
> >
> > thing.
> >
>
> shrink_zones() in try_to_free_pages() already called
> note_zone_s
On Jan 28, 2008 2:33 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:29:23 -0500 "minchan kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > shrink_zones in try_to_free_pages already set zone through
> > note_zone_scanning_priority.
> > So, setting prev_priority in try_to_free_pages is n
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:29:23 -0500 "minchan kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shrink_zones in try_to_free_pages already set zone through
> note_zone_scanning_priority.
> So, setting prev_priority in try_to_free_pages is needless.
>
> This patch is made by 2.6.24-rc8.
>
> Signed-off-by: barrios <
4 matches
Mail list logo