On Sat, 2005-04-02 23:03:14 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > Well, the patch looks fine, but you forgot to also do the VAX-specific
> > part. Withoug the BUGs, maybe the VAX kernel would be even fa
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-01 01:07:44 -0800, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I've been sitting on this patch for a while, figured it's high time I
> > shared it with the world. This patch eliminates all kernel bugs, t
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:34:54AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've been sitting on this patch for a while, figured it's high time I
> > shared it with the world. This patch eliminates all kernel bugs, trims
> > about 35k off the typical kernel, a
Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been sitting on this patch for a while, figured it's high time I
> shared it with the world. This patch eliminates all kernel bugs, trims
> about 35k off the typical kernel, and makes the system slightly
> faster. The patch is against the latest b
On Fri, 2005-04-01 01:07:44 -0800, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've been sitting on this patch for a while, figured it's high time I
> shared it with the world. This patch eliminates all kernel bugs, trims
> about 35k off the typical kernel, and makes th
5 matches
Mail list logo