On Wed 2014-07-23 16:26:41, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I don't think this patch is worthwhile. There is no legitimate reason
> to be using such large reads like this, and read(2) is always allowed
> to return a short read (for example, if a signal comes in while the
> read is happening). The only dif
I don't think this patch is worthwhile. There is no legitimate reason
to be using such large reads like this, and read(2) is always allowed
to return a short read (for example, if a signal comes in while the
read is happening). The only difference is that we are now guaranteed
to return a short-r
2 matches
Mail list logo
