On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 14:41 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> With compression initialization now separated from pstore_register(),
>> there is no longer a good reason to do compression method selection
>> during fs init. Instead, merge everything to
On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 14:41 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> With compression initialization now separated from pstore_register(),
> there is no longer a good reason to do compression method selection
> during fs init. Instead, merge everything together into the late init.
> Additionally cleans up the rep
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Sai Prakash Ranjan
wrote:
> On 10/18/2018 7:00 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> With compression initialization now separated from pstore_register(),
>>> there is no longer a good reason to do compressio
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> With compression initialization now separated from pstore_register(),
>> there is no longer a good reason to do compression method selection
>> during fs init. Instead, merge ever
On 10/18/2018 7:00 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
With compression initialization now separated from pstore_register(),
there is no longer a good reason to do compression method selection
during fs init. Instead, merge everything together into
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> With compression initialization now separated from pstore_register(),
> there is no longer a good reason to do compression method selection
> during fs init. Instead, merge everything together into the late init.
> Additionally cleans up
6 matches
Mail list logo
