On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:25:23AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
> In general, it all looks good. I only have 2 areas of concern. The first is
> a
> nit and it has to do with alternate pins for functions. There really isn't a
> need for a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:25:23AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
In general, it all looks good. I only have 2 areas of concern. The first is a
nit and it has to do with alternate pins for functions. There really isn't a
need for a separate function name. That would only be required if the same
2 matches
Mail list logo
