Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-06-21 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:37:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > This is sent to Torvalds, but you can simply suggest to Greg to pick > this for stable according to the process in: > Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst Yeah, I saw your pull request after hitting send. I'll send it to Gre

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-06-21 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:55:57PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Patch applied for fixes. > > Btw, any chance you can add the CC:stable tag to it or would you prefer > for me to backport it once it hits mainline? This is sent to Torvalds,

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-06-20 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:55:57PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > Patch applied for fixes. Btw, any chance you can add the CC:stable tag to it or would you prefer for me to backport it once it hits mainline? Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-06-20 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:22:05AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > If the interrupt _IS_ screaming because the hardware is buggered, then the > nobody cared thing will detect it and switch it off. That's all what we can > do, aside of not loading the driver at all. > > But that's way better than s

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-06-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 09:33:10AM +, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thanks for the prompt reply. Agree on points. > > > > we will validate at our end and shall provide the update. > > Any news on the issue? Resolution?

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-06-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 09:33:10AM +, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for the prompt reply. Agree on points. > > we will validate at our end and shall provide the update. Any news on the issue? Resolution? I still have a user reporting "irq 7: nobody cared (try boot

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-06-04 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 29 May 2017, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > The AMD pinctrl driver uses a chained interrupt to demultiplex the GPIO > > interrupts. Kevin Vandeventer reported, that his new AMD Ryzen locks up > > hard on boot when the AMD pinctrl dri

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-05-29 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The AMD pinctrl driver uses a chained interrupt to demultiplex the GPIO > interrupts. Kevin Vandeventer reported, that his new AMD Ryzen locks up > hard on boot when the AMD pinctrl driver is initialized. The reason is an > interrupt stor

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-05-26 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 09:33:10AM +, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for the prompt reply. Agree on points. > > we will validate at our end and shall provide the update. First of all, please do not top-post. What update are you talking about? The patch needs to go

RE: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-05-26 Thread Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra
; linux-g...@vger.kernel.org; Borislav Petkov ; Xue, Ken ; S-k, Shyam-sundar ; sta...@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained Nehal, On Fri, 26 May 2017, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > Thanks for the patch. However, we have received this is

RE: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-05-25 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Nehal, On Fri, 26 May 2017, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > Thanks for the patch. However, we have received this issue from multiple > people and different disro but it occurs only on Gigabyte hardware. With > reference AM4 ryzen board we are not facing this issue. We are in > discussion with g

RE: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

2017-05-25 Thread Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra
Hi Thomas, Thanks for the patch. However, we have received this issue from multiple people and different disro but it occurs only on Gigabyte hardware. With reference AM4 ryzen board we are not facing this issue. We are in discussion with gigabyte to check the BIOS part. Once we have clarity on