Hi David,
2013-07-09 오후 11:21, David Ahern 쓴 글:
On 7/9/13 1:41 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
He did. See 77d03596 and the note:
[ combined patch removing the -f usage in various sub-commands, such
as 'perf sched', etc, by Namhyung Kim ]
On 7/9/13 1:41 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
He did. See 77d03596 and the note:
[ combined patch removing the -f usage in various sub-commands, such
as 'perf sched', etc, by Namhyung Kim ]
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
2013-06-27 오후 1:25, Namhyung Kim 쓴 글:
From: Namhyung Kim
The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
internally by various sub-command
* David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/28/13 9:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* David Ahern wrote:
> >
> >>On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
>
> OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
> >>>
> >>>The '-f' option in record co
On 6/28/13 9:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* David Ahern wrote:
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
depreceated when we started
* David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >>>I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
> >>
> >>OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
> >
> >The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
> >depreceated when we started to backup perf.data
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
depreceated when we started to backup perf.data to perf.data.old..?
Way back in 2010, 2.6.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > From: Namhyung Kim
> > > >
> > > > The commit bf3da4014
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > From: Namhyung Kim
> > >
> > > The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
> > > rid of -f option from pe
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > From: Namhyung Kim
> >
> > The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
> > rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
> > internally by various sub-commands s
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim
>
> The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
> rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
> internally by various sub-commands so they wouldn't work anymore.
> Also up
11 matches
Mail list logo