On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Stephane,
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:37:51 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
>>> runs on a different kernel. A
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
>> Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:09:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>>> The perf report rebuilds machine states from the event records only. In
>>> this case, the kernel map
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:09:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> The perf report rebuilds machine states from the event records only. In
>> this case, the kernel map was recorded in the name of [kernel.kallsyms]
>> so it couldn
Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:09:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> >> Before:
> >> $ perf record -a usleep 1
> >> $ perf buildid-list
> >> 00d5ff078efe1d30b8492854f259215fd877ce30
> >> /lib/modules/3.16.0-rc2+/build/vmlinux
> >> 78186287bba77069a056a5ccbeb14b7fd2ca3a4b /usr/lib64/libc-2.1
Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:23:56AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hmm.. now I'm curious that why the -H option is needed at all.. the perf
> record already wrote build-ids that are actually hits..
Probably because when 'perf buildid-list' was introduced 'perf record'
was inserting all the PERF_RE
Hi Stephane,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:37:51 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
>> runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
>> by the prior commi
Hi Arnaldo,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:18:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:38:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
>> runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
>> by
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
> runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
> by the prior commit 0a7e6d1b6844 ("perf tools: Check recorded kernel
> version when finding vmlin
Em Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:38:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
> runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
> by the prior commit 0a7e6d1b6844 ("perf tools: Check recorded kernel
> version when find
Ping!
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:38:39 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
> runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
> by the prior commit 0a7e6d1b6844 ("perf tools: Check recorded kernel
> version when findi
10 matches
Mail list logo
