On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I'm for the clean revert I think. Crashing is bad, but hiding/delaying
> > it seems counter productive too, it'll just mean we'll only learn about
> > it later.
>
> So should I revert c05199e5a57a, with a Cc: stable?
Yep.
--
To unsu
* Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:43:32AM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > This leads me to believe that this patch:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:43:32AM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > This leads me to believe that this patch:
> > > > >
> > > > > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> > > > > Author: Kan Lian
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:43:32AM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > This leads me to believe that this patch:
> > > >
> > > > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> > > > Author: Kan Liang
> > > > Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +
> > > >
> >
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:43:32AM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> >
> > > This leads me to believe that this patch:
> > >
> > > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> > > Author: Kan Liang
> > > Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +
> > >
> > > perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>>
>> > This leads me to believe that this patch:
>> >
>> > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
>> > Author: Kan Liang
>> > Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +
>> >
>> > perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of dr
>
> > This leads me to believe that this patch:
> >
> > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> > Author: Kan Liang
> > Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +
> >
> > perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of driver
> initialization
> >
> > If I revert it, I bet things wi
> This leads me to believe that this patch:
>
> commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> Author: Kan Liang
> Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +
>
> perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of driver initialization
>
> If I revert it, I bet things will work again.
Yes
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Vince Weaver
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:
>>>
[ 79.473121] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:1335!
[ 79.477705]
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Vince Weaver
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:
>>
>>> [ 79.473121] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:1335!
>>> [ 79.477705] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
>> ...
>>> [ 79.694391] Call Tra
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
>> [ 79.473121] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:1335!
>> [ 79.477705] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
> ...
>> [ 79.694391] Call Trace:
>> [ 79.696997]
>> [ 79.699090] [] get_vm_area_caller+0x40
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:
> [ 79.473121] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:1335!
> [ 79.477705] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
...
> [ 79.694391] Call Trace:
> [ 79.696997]
> [ 79.699090] [] get_vm_area_caller+0x40/0x50
> [ 79.705505] [] ? snb_uncore_imc_init_box+0x6d/0x90
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug introduced by:
>
> commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> Author: Kan Liang
> Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +
I was hoping this would fix the uncore/imc bug that the perf_fuzzer
triggers on my Haswell box,
13 matches
Mail list logo
