On 05/12/2014 08:01 PM, George Spelvin wrote:
>> CONFIG_NTP_PPS not CONFIG_SMP, right?
> D'oh, yes. I just noticed that there were two versions and one was
> broken. Somehow my search for the enclosing #ifdef was completely broken.
> (I could swear I saw CONFIG_SMP, but looking now it's not even
> CONFIG_NTP_PPS not CONFIG_SMP, right?
D'oh, yes. I just noticed that there were two versions and one was
broken. Somehow my search for the enclosing #ifdef was completely broken.
(I could swear I saw CONFIG_SMP, but looking now it's not even mentioned
in the file; maybe I switched editor windo
No objections from me, of course. Good catch.
В Mon, 12 May 2014 10:54:29 -0700
John Stultz пишет:
> On 05/12/2014 06:35 AM, George Spelvin wrote:
> > It's an inline function always called with the global time_status
> > as an argument, so there's zero functional difference, but the
> > non-CONF
On 05/12/2014 06:35 AM, George Spelvin wrote:
> It's an inline function always called with the global time_status as an
> argument, so there's zero functional difference, but the non-CONFIG_SMP
> version uses the passed-in argument, while the CONFIG_SMP one ignores
> its argument and uses the globa
4 matches
Mail list logo
