Uwe Koziolek wrote:
Am 03.09.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Jay Vosburgh:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
Am 03.09.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Jay Vosburgh:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On2015-08-17 07:12
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
> On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>
On Tue, 01.09.2015 at 00:21 +0200 Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 2015-08-17 4:51 PM, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
...
Uwe, can you perhaps further enlighten us as to what num_grat_arp
se
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrot
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >Uwe Koziolek wrote:
> >
> >>On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >>>On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, J
On 2015-08-17 4:51 PM, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
...
Uwe, can you perhaps further enlighten us as to what num_grat_arp
settings were tried that didn't help? I'm still of the mi
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
From: Uwe Koziolek
With some very finicky switch hardware,
Uwe Koziolek wrote:
>On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
From: Uwe Koziolek
With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get
into
>>
On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
From: Uwe Koziolek
With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get
into
a situation where we play ping-pong between int
On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
From: Uwe Koziolek
With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get
into
a situation where we play ping-pong between interfaces, trying to get one
to come up as th
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
From: Uwe Koziolek
With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get into
a situation where we play ping-pong between interfaces, trying to get one
to come up as the active slave. There seems to be an issue with t
12 matches
Mail list logo