Re: [PATCH] moduleparam: Resolve missing-field-initializer warning

2014-09-04 Thread Rusty Russell
"Rustad, Mark D" writes: > On Aug 31, 2014, at 5:52 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Jeff Kirsher writes: >>> From: Mark Rustad >>> >>> Resolve a missing-field-initializer warning, that is produced >>> by every reference to module_param_call, by using designated >>> initialization for the first f

Re: [PATCH] moduleparam: Resolve missing-field-initializer warning

2014-09-02 Thread Rustad, Mark D
On Aug 31, 2014, at 5:52 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > Jeff Kirsher writes: >> From: Mark Rustad >> >> Resolve a missing-field-initializer warning, that is produced >> by every reference to module_param_call, by using designated >> initialization for the first field. That is enough to silence >>

Re: [PATCH] moduleparam: Resolve missing-field-initializer warning

2014-08-31 Thread Rusty Russell
Jeff Kirsher writes: > From: Mark Rustad > > Resolve a missing-field-initializer warning, that is produced > by every reference to module_param_call, by using designated > initialization for the first field. That is enough to silence > the complaint. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad > Signed-off-b