On Saturday 03 October 2015 03:49 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 03 October 2015 02:23 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:45:53 +0530 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> >
>>> >> On Friday 02 October 2015 04:55 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:24:20 +0530 Vineet
On Saturday 03 October 2015 02:23 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:45:53 +0530 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>> On Friday 02 October 2015 04:55 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:24:20 +0530 Vineet Gupta
>>> wrote:
>>>
> This came up when implementing HIHGMEM/PAE40 f
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:45:53 +0530 Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 02 October 2015 04:55 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:24:20 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> > wrote:
> >
> >> > This came up when implementing HIHGMEM/PAE40 for ARC.
> >> > The kmap() / kmap_atomic() generated code seem
On Friday 02 October 2015 04:55 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:24:20 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> > This came up when implementing HIHGMEM/PAE40 for ARC.
>> > The kmap() / kmap_atomic() generated code seemed needlessly bloated due
>> > to the way PageHighMem() macro is imp
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:24:20 +0530 Vineet Gupta
wrote:
> This came up when implementing HIHGMEM/PAE40 for ARC.
> The kmap() / kmap_atomic() generated code seemed needlessly bloated due
> to the way PageHighMem() macro is implemented.
> It derives the exact zone for page and then does pointer sub
On Tue 29-09-15 13:24:20, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> This came up when implementing HIHGMEM/PAE40 for ARC.
> The kmap() / kmap_atomic() generated code seemed needlessly bloated due
> to the way PageHighMem() macro is implemented.
> It derives the exact zone for page and then does pointer subtraction
> w
6 matches
Mail list logo