On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 21:30 +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:05:14AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 19:30 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > From: Markus Elfring
> > > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:09:13 +0100
> > >
> > > The function "kmalloc" was called in o
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:05:14AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 19:30 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring
> > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:09:13 +0100
> >
> > The function "kmalloc" was called in one case by the function "sb_equal"
> > without checking immedi
On 09.12.2016 19:30, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:09:13 +0100
The function "kmalloc" was called in one case by the function "sb_equal"
without checking immediately if it failed.
Err, your patch actually *replaces* the check. So where did you get the
On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 19:30 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:09:13 +0100
>
> The function "kmalloc" was called in one case by the function "sb_equal"
> without checking immediately if it failed.
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle sof
4 matches
Mail list logo