On 06/21/2013 07:35 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 21-06-2013 4:55, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
+void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
+ struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
+
On 06/21/2013 11:25 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 08:55 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On 06/20/2013 07:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>>>
>>> On 20-06-2013 6:26, Aaron Lu wrote:
+void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 08:55 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 07:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Hello.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> >
> > On 20-06-2013 6:26, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> +void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + f
Hello.
On 21-06-2013 4:55, Aaron Lu wrote:
+void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
+ struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
+ acpi_handle handle;
+ struct ata_device *dev;
+
+
On 06/21/2013 02:29 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:55:37AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>>> Please indent this line under the next character after ( above.
>>
>> Is there a link about this rule? I might have missed something about
>> coding style.
>
> I don't think the
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:55:37AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > Please indent this line under the next character after ( above.
>
> Is there a link about this rule? I might have missed something about
> coding style.
I don't think there's an explicit rule about that and I don't follow
i
On 06/20/2013 07:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
Hi,
Thanks for your comments.
>
> On 20-06-2013 6:26, Aaron Lu wrote:
>>
>> +void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host)
>> +{
>> +int i;
>> +
>> +for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
>> +struct ata_port *ap = ho
Hello.
On 20-06-2013 6:26, Aaron Lu wrote:
From: Liu Jiang
Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
removed ACPI dock notification related code, but there's some dead
code left, so clean up it.
[...]
Subject: [PATCH] libata-acpi: add back ACPI based hotplug fun
On 06/18/2013 05:16 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 02:01 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:50:20AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2013 11:02 AM, Liu Jiang wrote:
From: Liu Jiang
Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
remo
On 06/18/2013 02:01 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:50:20AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On 06/15/2013 11:02 AM, Liu Jiang wrote:
>>> From: Liu Jiang
>>>
>>> Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
>>> removed ACPI dock notification related code, but the
On 2013/6/18 2:01, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:50:20AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 06/15/2013 11:02 AM, Liu Jiang wrote:
From: Liu Jiang
Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
removed ACPI dock notification related code, but there's some dead
code l
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:50:20AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 06/15/2013 11:02 AM, Liu Jiang wrote:
> > From: Liu Jiang
> >
> > Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
> > removed ACPI dock notification related code, but there's some dead
> > code left, so clean up i
On 06/15/2013 11:02 AM, Liu Jiang wrote:
> From: Liu Jiang
>
> Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
> removed ACPI dock notification related code, but there's some dead
> code left, so clean up it.
I never noticed this, but it looks to be the case...
I'm not sure
13 matches
Mail list logo
