On 09/23/15 at 10:49am, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 09/23/15 at 09:37am, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > Hi, Dave.
> > > >
> > > > How about removing all of the prefix "crashkernel" in kexec_core. Thus
> > > > we can be consistent with the output message prefix "kexec".
> > >
> > > Ping, any comment is appr
On 09/23/15 at 01:26pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 09/23/15 at 01:14pm, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 09/23/15 at 10:49am, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > This is weird, user really don't need to know each file. I saw you added
> > > a new file kexec_internal.h and all three files includes it. Why not doing
> > >
On 09/23/15 at 01:14pm, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 09/23/15 at 10:49am, Baoquan He wrote:
> > This is weird, user really don't need to know each file. I saw you added
> > a new file kexec_internal.h and all three files includes it. Why not doing
> > it there to make it the same as before?
>
> The ou
On 09/23/15 at 10:49am, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 09/23/15 at 09:37am, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > Hi, Dave.
> > > >
> > > > How about removing all of the prefix "crashkernel" in kexec_core. Thus
> > > > we can be consistent with the output message prefix "kexec".
> > >
> > > Ping, any comment is appr
On 09/23/15 at 09:37am, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Hi, Dave.
> > >
> > > How about removing all of the prefix "crashkernel" in kexec_core. Thus
> > > we can be consistent with the output message prefix "kexec".
> >
> > Ping, any comment is appreciate and helpful.
>
> Remove "crashkernel" sounds not
On 09/23/15 at 12:07am, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 09/15/15 at 11:08am, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 09/14/15 at 04:44pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 09/14/15 at 03:50pm, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > On 09/13/15 at 11:52am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > Minfei Huang writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > k
On 09/15/15 at 11:08am, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 09/14/15 at 04:44pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 09/14/15 at 03:50pm, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > On 09/13/15 at 11:52am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > Minfei Huang writes:
> > > >
> > > > > kexec output message misses the prefix "kexec", when Dave Y
On 09/14/15 at 04:44pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 09/14/15 at 03:50pm, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 09/13/15 at 11:52am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Minfei Huang writes:
> > >
> > > > kexec output message misses the prefix "kexec", when Dave Young split
> > > > the kexec code. To keep the same form
On 09/14/15 at 03:50pm, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 09/13/15 at 11:52am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Minfei Huang writes:
> >
> > > kexec output message misses the prefix "kexec", when Dave Young split
> > > the kexec code. To keep the same format, add the prefix "kexec" to
> > > output message.
>
On 09/13/15 at 11:52am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Minfei Huang writes:
>
> > kexec output message misses the prefix "kexec", when Dave Young split
> > the kexec code. To keep the same format, add the prefix "kexec" to
> > output message.
>
> What of kexec_core? What of the messages that already
Minfei Huang writes:
> kexec output message misses the prefix "kexec", when Dave Young split
> the kexec code. To keep the same format, add the prefix "kexec" to
> output message.
What of kexec_core? What of the messages that already have a prefix?
Eric
> Following is the format of output mess
11 matches
Mail list logo
