On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:11:35PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:10:48PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Fix it by ensuring proceeding to the next slot doesn't carry over the
> > unaligned offset - ie. use round_up(id + 1, slot_distance) instead of
> > id += slot_distance.
> >
>
Hey, Li.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:39:50AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Fix it by ensuring proceeding to the next slot doesn't carry over the
> > unaligned offset - ie. use round_up(id + 1, slot_distance) instead of
> > id += slot_distance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
>
> Don't we need to c
On 2013/2/3 7:10, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The iteration logic of idr_get_next() is borrowed mostly verbatim from
> idr_for_each(). It walks down the tree looking for the slot matching
> the current ID. If the matching slot is not found, the ID is
> incremented by the distance of single slot at the giv
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/02/13 15:11, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:10:48PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Fix it by ensuring proceeding to the next slot doesn't carry over the
> >> unaligned offset - ie. use round_up(id + 1, slot_distance) instead of
> >> id
On 02/02/13 15:11, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:10:48PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Fix it by ensuring proceeding to the next slot doesn't carry over the
>> unaligned offset - ie. use round_up(id + 1, slot_distance) instead of
>> id += slot_distance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:10:48PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Fix it by ensuring proceeding to the next slot doesn't carry over the
> unaligned offset - ie. use round_up(id + 1, slot_distance) instead of
> id += slot_distance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
> Reported-by: David Teigland
> Cc: KAMEZ
6 matches
Mail list logo