On Mon 12-08-19 11:33:26, Sasha Levin wrote:
[...]
> I'd be happy to run whatever validation/regression suite for mm/ you
> would suggest.
You would have to develop one first and I am afraid that won't be really
simple and useful.
> I've heard the "every patch is a snowflake" story quite a few ti
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:33:26 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote:
> >I thought that absence of the Cc is the indication :P. Anyway, I really
> >do not understand why should we bother, really. I have tried to explain
> >that stable maintainers should follow Cc: stable because we bother to
> >consider that par
On Mon, 2019-08-12 at 11:33 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:22:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 12-08-19 15:14:12, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > On 8/12/19 10:45 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 11-08-19 19:46:14, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 20
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:22:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 12-08-19 15:14:12, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 8/12/19 10:45 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 11-08-19 19:46:14, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:46:33
On Mon 12-08-19 15:14:12, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 8/12/19 10:45 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 11-08-19 19:46:14, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:46:33 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It should work if
On 8/12/19 10:45 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 11-08-19 19:46:14, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:46:33 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>
>>> It should work if we ask stable trees maintainers not to backport
>>> such pat
On Sun 11-08-19 19:46:14, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:46:33 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > > > Maybe we should introduce the Fixes-no-stable: tag. That should get
> > > > their attention.
> > >
> > > No please,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:46:33 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
> Maybe we should introduce the Fixes-no-stable: tag. That should get
> their attention.
No please, Fixes shouldn't be really tight to any stable tree rules. It
is a very usef
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:46:33 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Maybe we should introduce the Fixes-no-stable: tag. That should get
> > their attention.
>
> No please, Fixes shouldn't be really tight to any stable tree rules. It
> is a very useful indication of which commit has introduced bug/problem
On Thu 08-08-19 16:39:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 20:53:13 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/1/165
> > >
> > > Ironic to find that commit message in a stable backport.
> > >
> > > I'm happy to drop the Fixes tag.
> >
> > No, please do not drop the
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 20:53:13 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/1/165
> >
> > Ironic to find that commit message in a stable backport.
> >
> > I'm happy to drop the Fixes tag.
>
> No, please do not drop the Fixes tag. That is a very _useful_
> information. If the stable
On Thu 08-08-19 09:55:45, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 8/8/19 12:47 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 08-08-19 09:46:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> On Wed 07-08-19 17:05:33, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>> Li Wang discovered that LTP/move_page12 V2 sometimes triggers SIGBUS
> >>> in the kernel-v5.2.3 testing.
On 8/8/19 12:47 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 08-08-19 09:46:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 07-08-19 17:05:33, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> Li Wang discovered that LTP/move_page12 V2 sometimes triggers SIGBUS
>>> in the kernel-v5.2.3 testing. This is caused by a race between hugetlb
>>> page migr
On Thu 08-08-19 09:46:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 07-08-19 17:05:33, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > Li Wang discovered that LTP/move_page12 V2 sometimes triggers SIGBUS
> > in the kernel-v5.2.3 testing. This is caused by a race between hugetlb
> > page migration and page fault.
> >
> > If a hugetlb
On Wed 07-08-19 17:05:33, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Li Wang discovered that LTP/move_page12 V2 sometimes triggers SIGBUS
> in the kernel-v5.2.3 testing. This is caused by a race between hugetlb
> page migration and page fault.
>
> If a hugetlb page can not be allocated to satisfy a page fault, the ta
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:05:33PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Li Wang discovered that LTP/move_page12 V2 sometimes triggers SIGBUS
> in the kernel-v5.2.3 testing. This is caused by a race between hugetlb
> page migration and page fault.
>
> If a hugetlb page can not be allocated to satisfy a pa
On 8/7/19 7:24 PM, 裘稀石(稀石) wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Do you mean the similar race is like the following?
>
> migration clearing the pte
> page fault(before we return error, and now we return 0, then try page fault
> again, right?)
> migration writing a migration entry
Yes, something like the
17 matches
Mail list logo
