Re: [PATCH] get rid of NR_OPEN and introduce a sysctl_nr_open

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:09:19 +0100, Eric Dumazet said: Changing NR_OPEN is not considered safe because of vmalloc space potential exhaust. Verbiage about this point... +nr_open +--- + +Denotes the maximum number of file-handles a process can +allocate. Defau

Re: [PATCH] get rid of NR_OPEN and introduce a sysctl_nr_open

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:09:19 +0100, Eric Dumazet said: > Changing NR_OPEN is not considered safe because of vmalloc space potential > exhaust. Verbiage about this point... > +nr_open > +--- > + > +Denotes the maximum number of file-handles a process can > +allocate. Default value is 1024*1