On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:53 AM, zhouchengming
> wrote:
> > On 2017/1/16 17:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Zhou Chengming wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you please stop sending the same patch over and over every other day?
> >>
> >> G
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:53 AM, zhouchengming
wrote:
> On 2017/1/16 17:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Zhou Chengming wrote:
>>
>> Can you please stop sending the same patch over and over every other day?
>>
>> Granted, things get forgotten, but sending a polite reminder aft
On 2017/1/16 17:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Zhou Chengming wrote:
Can you please stop sending the same patch over and over every other day?
Granted, things get forgotten, but sending a polite reminder after a week
is definitely enough.
Maintainers are not machines respondin
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Zhou Chengming wrote:
Can you please stop sending the same patch over and over every other day?
Granted, things get forgotten, but sending a polite reminder after a week
is definitely enough.
Maintainers are not machines responding within a split second on every mail
they ge
ping...
On 2017/1/12 17:32, Zhou Chengming wrote:
After online an offline cpu, cpu_hw_events.excl_thread_id will always be
set to 1 in intel_pmu_cpu_starting() even when its sibling's excl_thread_id
is also 1. Then the two siblings will use the same state in their shared
hw_hw_events.excl_cntrs,
5 matches
Mail list logo