Hi Chao,
Thanks for the review and suggestions.
I think the below code should work and cover all the cases we discussed.
Let me test it and then put up a new patchset for review.
Thanks,
Sahitya.
Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 06:31:00PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Sahitya,
>
> On 2021/3/15 17:45, Sahity
Hi Sahitya,
On 2021/3/15 17:45, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
Hi Chao,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:10:22PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Sahitya,
On 2021/3/15 15:46, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
Hi Chao,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:12:44PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Sahitya,
On 2021/3/15 12:56, Sahitya Tummala wr
Hi Chao,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:10:22PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Sahitya,
>
> On 2021/3/15 15:46, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> >Hi Chao,
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:12:44PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>Sahitya,
> >>
> >>On 2021/3/15 12:56, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> >>>When f2fs is heavily uti
Hi Sahitya,
On 2021/3/15 15:46, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
Hi Chao,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:12:44PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Sahitya,
On 2021/3/15 12:56, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
When f2fs is heavily utilized over 80%, the current discard policy
sets the max sleep timeout of discard thread as 50ms
Hi Chao,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:12:44PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Sahitya,
>
> On 2021/3/15 12:56, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> >When f2fs is heavily utilized over 80%, the current discard policy
> >sets the max sleep timeout of discard thread as 50ms
> >(DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME). But this is se
Sahitya,
On 2021/3/15 12:56, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
When f2fs is heavily utilized over 80%, the current discard policy
sets the max sleep timeout of discard thread as 50ms
(DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME). But this is set even when there are
no pending discard commands to be issued. This results int
6 matches
Mail list logo
