On 2018/1/31 9:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/1/29 16:31, Yunlong Song wrote:
>>> The old commit allocates hot data & nodes in the beginning of partition
>>> both for heap and
>>> noheap mode. But from the commit message, the heap mode should be like
>>> before, i.e.
On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/1/29 16:31, Yunlong Song wrote:
> > The old commit allocates hot data & nodes in the beginning of partition
> > both for heap and
> > noheap mode. But from the commit message, the heap mode should be like
> > before, i.e.,
> > allocate hot data & nodes from curs
On 2018/1/29 16:31, Yunlong Song wrote:
> The old commit allocates hot data & nodes in the beginning of partition
> both for heap and
> noheap mode. But from the commit message, the heap mode should be like
> before, i.e.,
> allocate hot data & nodes from curseg to left.
Let's ping Jaegeuk to ch
The old commit allocates hot data & nodes in the beginning of partition
both for heap and
noheap mode. But from the commit message, the heap mode should be like
before, i.e.,
allocate hot data & nodes from curseg to left.
On 2018/1/29 16:12, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Yunlong,
On 2018/1/29 11:37, Yunl
Hi Yunlong,
On 2018/1/29 11:37, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Commit 7a20b8a61eff81bdb7097a578752a74860e9d142 ("f2fs: allocate node
> and hot data in the beginning of partition") introduces another mount
> option, heap, to reset it back. But it does not do anything for heap
> mode, so fix it.
I think Jae
5 matches
Mail list logo