On 09/07/2020 16:44, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:27 AM Navid Emamdoost
wrote:
in panfrost_job_hw_submit, pm_runtime_get_sync is called which
increments the counter even in case of failure, leading to incorrect
ref count. In case of failure, decrement the ref count before retu
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:27 AM Navid Emamdoost
wrote:
>
> in panfrost_job_hw_submit, pm_runtime_get_sync is called which
> increments the counter even in case of failure, leading to incorrect
> ref count. In case of failure, decrement the ref count before returning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Navid Emam
Acked-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 01:27:30AM -0500, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> in panfrost_job_hw_submit, pm_runtime_get_sync is called which
> increments the counter even in case of failure, leading to incorrect
> ref count. In case of failure, decrement the ref count before retu
> in panfrost_job_hw_submit, …
* Can the term “reference count” become relevant also for this commit message
besides other possible adjustments?
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes”?
…
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
…
> @@ -184,6 +183,9 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_subm
> in panfrost_job_hw_submit, …
* Can the term “reference count” become relevant also for this commit message
besides other possible adjustments?
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes”?
…
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
…
> @@ -184,6 +183,9 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_subm
> in panfrost_job_hw_submit, …
* Can the term “reference count” become relevant also for this commit message
besides other possible adjustments?
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes”?
…
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
…
> @@ -184,6 +183,9 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_subm
6 matches
Mail list logo
