Hey,
Op 05-02-13 21:52, Ben Skeggs schreef:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
>>> 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
>>> locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> > 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> > locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> > Tell it to distinguish subde
Hi Maarten
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 22:59 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> > 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> > locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> > Tell it to distinguish
Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> Tell it to distinguish subdevs by (o)class type.
Apart from this specific case, is there any other reas
4 matches
Mail list logo
