On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 13:46 +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> On 31 July 2012 13:38, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Vinod Koul
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This patch will appear in 3.7-rc2 when I send the fixes to Linus post
> >> rc1, I guess early next week.
> >
> > I guess you
On 31 July 2012 13:38, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Vinod Koul
> wrote:
>
>> This patch will appear in 3.7-rc2 when I send the fixes to Linus post
>> rc1, I guess early next week.
>
> I guess you mean 3.6-rc2, right?
>
>> Stable guys will pick this and apply to 3.6.X
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> This patch will appear in 3.7-rc2 when I send the fixes to Linus post
> rc1, I guess early next week.
I guess you mean 3.6-rc2, right?
> Stable guys will pick this and apply to 3.6.X version.
I guess you mean 3.5.x, right?
--
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 14:38 +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> On 30 July 2012 13:31, javier Martin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 27 July 2012 13:37, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Vinod Koul
> >> wrote:
> >>
> Reported-by: Javier Martin
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Est
On 30 July 2012 13:31, javier Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27 July 2012 13:37, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Vinod Koul
>> wrote:
>>
Reported-by: Javier Martin
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
>>> Applied thanks (to fixes-for 3.7)
>>
>> You mentioned that you w
Hi,
On 27 July 2012 13:37, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Vinod Koul
> wrote:
>
>>> Reported-by: Javier Martin
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
>> Applied thanks (to fixes-for 3.7)
>
> You mentioned that you would also copy stable. Would it be applied
> into stable s
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> Reported-by: Javier Martin
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> Applied thanks (to fixes-for 3.7)
You mentioned that you would also copy stable. Would it be applied
into stable soon too?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 15:33 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> With the new i.MX clock infrastructure we need to request the dma clocks
> seperately: ahb and ipg clocks.
>
> This fixes the following kernel crash and make audio to be functional again:
>
> root@freescale /home$
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:46 +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> Who is responsible of applying this patch?
>
> It seems 3.5 has been released without it.
>
The buck stops here :(
Sorry looks like this got missed while I was on vacation.
Now that 3.5 is released, I will CC stable and apply this to my
Who is responsible of applying this patch?
It seems 3.5 has been released without it.
--
Javier Martin
Vista Silicon S.L.
CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345
Avda de los Castros s/n
39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain
+34 942 25 32 60
www.vista-silicon.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
10 matches
Mail list logo