Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL

2005-08-31 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:45:54PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > I've posted similar patches in the past, but was asked to first until the > short-circuit patch moved from -mm to mainline - and since it is now > firmly there in 2.6.13 I assume there's no problem there anymore. > I was also asked

Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL

2005-08-30 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 8/30/05, Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 22:45 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > Since the patch to add a NULL short-circuit to crypto_free_tfm() went in, > > there's no longer any need for callers of that function to check for NULL. > > This patch removes the re

Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL

2005-08-30 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 22:45 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Since the patch to add a NULL short-circuit to crypto_free_tfm() went in, > there's no longer any need for callers of that function to check for NULL. > This patch removes the redundant NULL checks and also a few similar checks > for NULL bef

Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL

2005-08-30 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:45:54PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Since the patch to add a NULL short-circuit to crypto_free_tfm() went in, > there's no longer any need for callers of that function to check for NULL. ... > Feedback, ACK, NACK, etc welcome. I've no problem with the auth_gss or nfsv4