On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Nobody is depending on shit, the patch is removing a completely pointless
> > memory allocation in braindead cpuset code. What you think is "harmful"
> > or "more harmful" is irrelevant, but nobody said anything about depending
> > on that behavior to
Hey,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:51:12AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> Nobody is depending on shit, the patch is removing a completely pointless
> memory allocation in braindead cpuset code. What you think is "harmful"
> or "more harmful" is irrelevant, but nobody said anything about depending
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > It's not harmless, if heap_init() fails with -ENOMEM then the write fails
> > even though it may not be for memory_spread_page or memory_spread_slab,
> > which is the minority of the callers of this function.
>
> And depending on details like that would
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:03:18PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 January 2014 15:57, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Ummm... so, the original posting forgot to cc Li (the maintainer), me
> > or cgroups mailing list. Please don't do this in the future.
>
> I thought Ingo/PeterZ are maintainers of this
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:33:27AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> It's not harmless, if heap_init() fails with -ENOMEM then the write fails
> even though it may not be for memory_spread_page or memory_spread_slab,
> which is the minority of the callers of this function.
And depending on details
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> update_flag() routine uses heap only when spread_flag_changed is true.
> >> Otherwise
> >> heap isn't used, but is allocated and freed unnecessarily.
> >>
>
> but harmless
>
It's not harmless, if heap_init() fails with -ENOMEM then the write fails
eve
On 24 January 2014 15:57, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Ummm... so, the original posting forgot to cc Li (the maintainer), me
> or cgroups mailing list. Please don't do this in the future.
I thought Ingo/PeterZ are maintainers of this as well, just after sending
patch I had a look at MAINTAINERS to see if
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:27:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 January 2014 07:28, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> Acked-by: David Rientjes
> >
> > Acked-by: Li Zefan
>
> Thanks..
>
> > I would like this patch be picked up by Tejun. I'll send out a patchset
> > for cpuset which may have conflictio
On 24 January 2014 07:28, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Acked-by: David Rientjes
>
> Acked-by: Li Zefan
Thanks..
> I would like this patch be picked up by Tejun. I'll send out a patchset
> for cpuset which may have confliction with this one.
Its already applied by Andrew Morton..
--
To unsubscribe from
Cc: Tejun
On 2014/1/24 5:31, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
>> update_flag() routine uses heap only when spread_flag_changed is true.
>> Otherwise
>> heap isn't used, but is allocated and freed unnecessarily.
>>
but harmless
>> Fix this by allocating heap on
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> update_flag() routine uses heap only when spread_flag_changed is true.
> Otherwise
> heap isn't used, but is allocated and freed unnecessarily.
>
> Fix this by allocating heap only when required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
Acked-by: David Rientj
11 matches
Mail list logo