On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:02 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 04:35:24 PST (-0800), a...@brainfault.org wrote:
> > Currently, we don't have a sched_clock registered for RISC-V systems.
> > This means Linux time keeping will use jiffies (running at HZ) as the
> > default sched_clock.
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 04:35:24 PST (-0800), a...@brainfault.org wrote:
Currently, we don't have a sched_clock registered for RISC-V systems.
This means Linux time keeping will use jiffies (running at HZ) as the
default sched_clock.
To avoid this, we explicity provide sched_clock using RISC-V rdtim
On 03/12/2018 15:50, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 6:29 PM Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>>
>> On 03/12/2018 13:35, Anup Patel wrote:
>>> Currently, we don't have a sched_clock registered for RISC-V systems.
>>> This means Linux time keeping will use jiffies (running at HZ) as the
>>> defa
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 6:29 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2018 13:35, Anup Patel wrote:
> > Currently, we don't have a sched_clock registered for RISC-V systems.
> > This means Linux time keeping will use jiffies (running at HZ) as the
> > default sched_clock.
> >
> > To avoid this, we exp
On 03/12/2018 13:35, Anup Patel wrote:
> Currently, we don't have a sched_clock registered for RISC-V systems.
> This means Linux time keeping will use jiffies (running at HZ) as the
> default sched_clock.
>
> To avoid this, we explicity provide sched_clock using RISC-V rdtime
> instruction (simil
5 matches
Mail list logo