On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 05:55 -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 10/18/20 1:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 13:07 -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > I like!
> > []
> > > could add a '|break' here to catch the couple
> > []
> > > break;
> > >
> > > break;
> > Unfortunately, checkpatch is really
On 10/18/20 1:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 13:07 -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>> I like!
> []
>> could add a '|break' here to catch the couple
> []
>> break;
>>
>> break;
> Unfortunately, checkpatch is really stupid and it
> wouldn't catch those
> cases as there are blank lines
> be
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 13:07 -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> I like!
[]
> could add a '|break' here to catch the couple
[]
> break;
>
> break;
Unfortunately, checkpatch is really stupid and it
wouldn't catch those
cases as there are blank lines
between the existing consecutive break
statements.
It would
I like!
On 10/18/20 12:49 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> switch/case use of break after a return or goto is unnecessary.
>
> There is an existing warning for these uses, so add a --fix option too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
> ---
>
> For today's next, this would remove ~300 instances like:
>
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
