Re: [PATCH] audit: process errors from filter user rules

On 13/12/05, Eric Paris wrote: > I know we talked about this patch, and it seemed like a good idea at the > time, but honestly, these races are so rare, it isn't worth the code > complexity. I tried to simplify the readability of your code and got > something better, but still the loop is needless

Re: [PATCH] audit: process errors from filter user rules

I know we talked about this patch, and it seemed like a good idea at the time, but honestly, these races are so rare, it isn't worth the code complexity. I tried to simplify the readability of your code and got something better, but still the loop is needless... Just log the messages on any error