Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm660: Fix CPU capacities

2021-01-13 Thread AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Il 13/01/21 05:37, Danny Lin ha scritto: On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:04 pm, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Il 12/01/21 15:59, Alexey Minnekhanov ha scritto: Hi! I always had a feeling something is not right in those cpu definitions, so cpus with reg 100-103 are little cores, and 0-3 big one

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm660: Fix CPU capacities

2021-01-12 Thread Danny Lin
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:04 pm, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Il 12/01/21 15:59, Alexey Minnekhanov ha scritto: Hi! I always had a feeling something is not right in those cpu definitions, so cpus with reg 100-103 are little cores, and 0-3 big ones? But downstream sdm660.dtsi has a prope

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm660: Fix CPU capacities

2021-01-12 Thread AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Il 12/01/21 15:59, Alexey Minnekhanov ha scritto: Hi! I always had a feeling something is not right in those cpu definitions, so cpus with reg 100-103 are little cores, and 0-3 big ones? But downstream sdm660.dtsi has a property "efficiency" [1] with values which are larger for cores 100-103 than

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm660: Fix CPU capacities

2021-01-12 Thread Alexey Minnekhanov
Hi! I always had a feeling something is not right in those cpu definitions, so cpus with reg 100-103 are little cores, and 0-3 big ones? But downstream sdm660.dtsi has a property "efficiency" [1] with values which are larger for cores 100-103 than for 0-3 cores (1638 > 1024), I'm confused... Prope