Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked()

2017-04-27 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 06:03:35PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 27/04/17 17:35, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > >@@ -1092,7 +1093,9 @@ void check_local_cpu_capabilities(void) > > > > static void __init setup_feature_capabilities(void) > > { > >-update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, "detected

Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked()

2017-04-27 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
On 27/04/17 17:35, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: rom f3b0809224e4915197d3ae4a38ebe7f210e74abf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Rutland Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:48:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked() Build break alert. There are some issues with pat

Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked() (was: Re: [patch V2 00/24] cpu/hotplug: Convert get_online_cpus() to a percpu_rwsem)

2017-04-27 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Catalin/Will, > > The below addresses a boot failure Catalin spotted in next-20170424, > based on Sebastian's patch [1]. I've given it a spin on Juno R1, where I > can reproduce the issue prior to applying this patch. > > I believ