On 07/14/2016 02:14 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.07.16 09:03, Zheng Xu wrote:
LuaJIT also fix the 48VA issue by allocating heap memory below 47 bits.
For mozjs issue, if there are pointers to .rodata, it can be a problem. Does it
happen on master and do we have any case to reproduce the is
On 13 July 2016 at 18:14, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 07/13/2016 05:59 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> On 13 July 2016 at 17:42, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> Some user space applications are known to break with 48 bits virtual
>>
>> known by whom? At least I wasn't aware of it, so could you pleas
> Am 14.07.2016 um 09:49 schrieb Zheng Xu :
>
> Sorry, I might misunderstand the issue. I thought there are still issues with
> master.
>
> I saw that you've mentioned there are pointers to .rodata. And I only fixed
> the heap. So I am just worried if there can be issues with .rodata. If
> po
m-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
Stuart Monteith
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add config to limit user space to 47bits
On 14.07.16 09:03, Zheng Xu wrote:
> LuaJIT also fix the 48VA issue by allocating heap memory below 47 bits.
>
> For mozjs issue, if there are pointers to .rodata, it can be a problem. Doe
On 14.07.16 09:03, Zheng Xu wrote:
> LuaJIT also fix the 48VA issue by allocating heap memory below 47 bits.
>
> For mozjs issue, if there are pointers to .rodata, it can be a problem. Does
> it happen on master and do we have any case to reproduce the issue so that I
> can take a look?
mozjs
: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: 14 July 2016 14:39
To: Steve Capper
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel; Mark Rutland; mbrug...@suse.com; Catalin Marinas; Will
Deacon; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
Stuart Monteith; Zheng Xu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add config to
> On 14 Jul 2016, at 03:08, Steve Capper wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for posting this.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 06:14:11PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 07/13/2016 05:59 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 13 July 2016 at 17:42, Alexander Graf wrote:
Some user space applications
Hi Alex,
Thanks for posting this.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 06:14:11PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 07/13/2016 05:59 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >On 13 July 2016 at 17:42, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>Some user space applications are known to break with 48 bits virtual
> >known by whom? At least
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 05:42:47PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Some user space applications are known to break with 48 bits virtual
> address space. As interim step until the world is healed and everyone
> embraces correct code, this patch allows to only expose 47 bits of
> virtual address space
On 07/13/2016 05:59 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 13 July 2016 at 17:42, Alexander Graf wrote:
Some user space applications are known to break with 48 bits virtual
known by whom? At least I wasn't aware of it, so could you please
share some examples?
Sure! Known to me so far are:
* mozjs17
On 13 July 2016 at 17:42, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Some user space applications are known to break with 48 bits virtual
known by whom? At least I wasn't aware of it, so could you please
share some examples?
> address space. As interim step until the world is healed and everyone
> embraces correct
11 matches
Mail list logo
