On 07/31/2014 02:58 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>
> Hey! Sorry for the late response here.
>
> So this seems reasonable as always failing suspend is problematic, but
> I worry that for the case where we do have a failure to read or set
> the RTC, we'd suspend and not wake up as specified, which is a
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Hyogi Gim wrote:
> In alarmtimer_suspend(), the error after rtc_read_time() is not checked.
> If rtc device fail to read rtc time, we cannot ensure the following process.
>
> Furthermore, the return value of rtc_timer_start() needs to distinguish
> -ETIME and other
2 matches
Mail list logo
