Re: [PATCH] add support for dynamic ticks and preempt rcu

2008-02-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i've added it a few days ago and it's already in the sched-devel.git > tree: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git OK, thanks! I know everyone is extremely busy now and I just wanted to make sure this didn't

Re: [PATCH] add support for dynamic ticks and preempt rcu

2008-02-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ > Resending this patch because no one commented on it (besides Paul) > and I'm thinking it got lost in the noise. > Without this patch, preempt RCU is broken when NO_HZ is configured. > ] i've added it a few days ago and it's already in the s

Re: [PATCH] add support for dynamic ticks and preempt rcu

2008-01-29 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:18:12AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > [ > Paul, you had your Signed-off-by in the RT patch, so I attached it here > too > ] Works for me!!! > The PREEMPT-RCU can get stuck if a CPU goes idle and NO_HZ is set. The > idle CPU will not progress the RCU through its g