> Details, please. How do you reproduce that behaviour?
>
> I don't like that loop in its current form (it relies upon _not_ encountering
> the
> same ->mnt_root in the parts of tree we hadn't copied), but your change
> doesn't make it any better. Seeing a reproducer would be useful in sorting
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:56:43AM +0800, Leon Ma wrote:
> We encountered following panic. Validate the pointer to avoid this.
> @@ -2788,7 +2788,7 @@ struct mnt_namespace *copy_mnt_ns(unsigned long flags,
> struct mnt_namespace *ns,
> q = next_mnt(q, new);
> if (!q)
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
