Re: [PATCH] VM fixes + RSS limits 2.4.0-test13-pre5

2001-01-07 Thread Peter Chubb
Ingo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:43:54AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2000, Mike Sklar wrote: > > > If I wanted to adjust the rlim_cur value of a running > > > processes, is there any sort of interface for that? > > > > Hmmm, I don't think there is an interface to adjus

Re: [PATCH] VM fixes + RSS limits 2.4.0-test13-pre5

2001-01-03 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:43:54AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2000, Mike Sklar wrote: > > If I wanted to adjust the rlim_cur value of a running > > processes, is there any sort of interface for that? > > Hmmm, I don't think there is an interface to adjust the > per-process ulimit

Re: [PATCH] VM fixes + RSS limits 2.4.0-test13-pre5

2001-01-03 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 28 Dec 2000, Mike Sklar wrote: > If I wanted to adjust the rlim_cur value of a running > processes, is there any sort of interface for that? Hmmm, I don't think there is an interface to adjust the per-process ulimit settings on-the-fly ... Does anybody know if there's an interface for t

Re: [PATCH] VM fixes + RSS limits 2.4.0-test13-pre5 / test13-pre7

2000-12-30 Thread Dieter Nützel
Hello Rik, I did some more benchmarks on this --- puh, took me some time...:-) Test machine: 256 MB, K7 550 SlotA, SCSI, IDE, ReiserFS 3.6.23, Blocksize=4K Test: dbench 48 2.4.0-test13-pre5 + Rik's VM fix #2 /dev/sda7: Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 6.07 seconds = 10.54 MB/sec Throug

Re: [PATCH] VM fixes + RSS limits 2.4.0-test13-pre5

2000-12-29 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2000 14:38 schrieben Sie: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > your patch didn't apply clean. > > Have you another version? > > It should apply just fine. What error messages did > patch give ? > Applied #2 against my running 2.4.0-test13-pre5 + ReiserFS 3.6.23