On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:34:52 -0500
Cliff Wickman wrote:
> From: Cliff Wickman
>
> (this was sent as an ack on 9/13, but with incorrect title and sign-off)
>
> Ack.
> But with the adjustment below. The 'end' argument was not declared long.
>
> I tested the patch on a UV.
> It has the effect o
* Cliff Wickman wrote:
> From: Cliff Wickman
>
> (this was sent as an ack on 9/13, but with incorrect title and sign-off)
>
> Ack.
> But with the adjustment below. The 'end' argument was not declared long.
>
> I tested the patch on a UV.
> It has the effect of either clearing 1 or all TLBs
* Cliff Wickman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:53:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Ack?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ingo
>
> Ack.
> But with the adjustment below. The 'end' argument was not declared long.
Ok, great - mind sending the updated patch properly under a new
title (th
On 09/14/2012 05:20 AM, Cliff Wickman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:53:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> Ack?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ingo
>
> Ack.
> But with the adjustment below. The 'end' argument was not declared long.
>
> I tested the patch on a UV.
> It has the effect of either
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:53:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Ack?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Ack.
But with the adjustment below. The 'end' argument was not declared long.
I tested the patch on a UV.
It has the effect of either clearing 1 or all TLBs in a cpu.
I added some debugging to tes
On 09/07/2012 03:10 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.09.12 at 07:37, Alex Shi wrote:
>> @@ -1113,7 +1114,10 @@ const struct cpumask *uv_flush_tlb_others(const
>> struct
>> cpumask *cpumask,
>>
>> record_send_statistics(stat, locals, hubs, remotes, bau_desc);
>>
>> -bau_desc->paylo
>>> On 07.09.12 at 07:37, Alex Shi wrote:
> @@ -1113,7 +1114,10 @@ const struct cpumask *uv_flush_tlb_others(const struct
> cpumask *cpumask,
>
> record_send_statistics(stat, locals, hubs, remotes, bau_desc);
>
> - bau_desc->payload.address = start;
> + if (!end)
So despite hav
On 09/07/2012 07:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:57:35 +0800
> Alex Shi wrote:
>
>> The flush tlb optimization code has logical issue on UV platform.
>> It doesn't flush the full range at all, since it simply
>> ignores its 'end' parameter (and hence also the "all" indicator
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:57:35 +0800
Alex Shi wrote:
> The flush tlb optimization code has logical issue on UV platform.
> It doesn't flush the full range at all, since it simply
> ignores its 'end' parameter (and hence also the "all" indicator)
> in uv_flush_tlb_others() function.
>
> This patch
9 matches
Mail list logo
